Having the Right to Culture Also Means Being Able to Make It

Talking about cultural rights means going beyond access to goods, services, venues, or programmes. Being able to attend a concert, visit a museum, or use a library is part of those rights, but it does not exhaust them. Culture is not simply something that some people produce and others receive. It is also a space where we build narratives, express identities, share knowledge, establish relationships, and take part in collective life.

Exercising cultural rights therefore means having real opportunities to create, express oneself, produce, organise, cooperate, and participate. It means recognising people not only as audiences for a cultural offer, but also as agents capable of launching initiatives, creating spaces, developing projects, and taking part in decisions that shape the cultural life of their territories.

The right to culture move beyond being understood solely as the right to access what others produce and become, as well, the effective possibility of creating, organising, and participating in the construction of cultural life.

This distinction matters. A society may have a rich cultural programme, good facilities, and high levels of cultural consumption while still offering few opportunities for someone to turn an idea into a project, find a space in which to develop it, organise with others, or access the resources needed to sustain it. Guaranteeing access is essential. But cultural democracy also requires us to expand people’s capacity to make culture.

Strengthening the cultural fabric is precisely about that capacity for action. It requires resources and funding that make it possible to develop projects, pay for work, and sustain processes over time. It also requires creating better conditions for people, collectives, and organisations to develop their own initiatives, make decisions with greater autonomy, build relationships, and give continuity to their work.

The capacity to act depends on many factors. It depends on available knowledge, on tools for designing and managing a project, on access to funding and spaces, on the strength of teams, and on relationships that make it possible to find collaborators, learning opportunities, and new possibilities. It also depends on the context in which these initiatives operate. A project may be well designed and supported by a capable team, yet still face major difficulties if there are no accessible spaces, if funding is unstable, or if cultural policies fail to recognise certain forms of organisation and participation.

That is why strengthening the cultural fabric means working simultaneously on the capacities of those who make culture and on the conditions that allow those capacities to develop. It means expanding the autonomy of cultural actors, facilitating the circulation of knowledge and resources, improving opportunities for cooperation and access, and creating environments in which a greater diversity of initiatives can emerge, grow, and be sustained over time.

This perspective leads us to a question we at Fes! Cultura have been asking ourselves for some time. Where can we act to strengthen the cultural fabric? If the cultural capacity of a territory depends on multiple factors, it seems clear that we need to work at more than one scale.

The first is projects. Many initiatives begin with an idea, an artistic practice, or a need identified in a particular territory. Turning them into viable projects requires knowledge, tools, support, resources, networks, and opportunities. Strengthening this scale means increasing the capacity of people and collectives to make decisions, plan, organise, and build sustainable proposals.

The second is organisations. Projects need structures that allow them to continue over time. Associations, cooperatives, foundations, cultural enterprises, and other teams accumulate knowledge, sustain relationships, and make it possible for an initiative not to depend permanently on the efforts of just a few people. Working on their strategy, organisation, governance, sustainability, and alliances helps consolidate this collective capacity.

The third is ecosystems. Even strong projects and solid organisations encounter limits when the environment in which they operate makes development difficult. Public administrations, institutions, cultural venues, and networks have the capacity to change those conditions through policies, programmes, funding, access to spaces, participation mechanisms, network activation, and forms of recognition that are more open to existing cultural diversity.

Strengthening the cultural fabric requires connecting these three scales. Increasing the capacity of those who lead projects, consolidating the organisations that sustain them, and improving the conditions in which they operate. Only then can the right to culture move beyond being understood solely as the right to access what others produce and become, as well, the effective possibility of creating, organising, and participating in the construction of cultural life.

By: Diego Salazar